lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VfmKvAy6bSk70g3c2qJcUzzo0AUhzxR6dFja+ZppGMLRg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 27 Jul 2020 16:38:40 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Vaibhav Gupta <vaibhavgupta40@...il.com>
Cc:     Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn@...gaas.com>,
        Vaibhav Gupta <vaibhav.varodek@...il.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        linux-spi <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] spi: spi-topcliff-pch: drop call to wakeup-disable

On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 4:21 PM Vaibhav Gupta <vaibhavgupta40@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Before generic upgrade, both .suspend() and .resume() were invoking
> pci_enable_wake(pci_dev, PCI_D3hot, 0). Hence, disabling wakeup in both
> states. (Normal trend is .suspend() enables and .resume() disables the
> wakeup.)
>
> This was ambiguous and may be buggy. Instead of replicating the legacy
> behavior, drop the wakeup-disable call.
>

> Fix: f185bcc77980("spi: spi-topcliff-pch: use generic power management")

Fixes: and missed space.

Note:

% grep one ~/.gitconfig
       one = show -s --pretty='format:%h (\"%s\")'

% git one f185bcc77980
f185bcc77980 ("spi: spi-topcliff-pch: use generic power management")

> Reported by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>

Missed dash. Does checkpatch complain?

> Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Gupta <vaibhavgupta40@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/spi/spi-topcliff-pch.c | 2 --
>  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-topcliff-pch.c b/drivers/spi/spi-topcliff-pch.c
> index 281a90f1b5d8..c73a03ddf5f3 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-topcliff-pch.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-topcliff-pch.c
> @@ -1648,8 +1648,6 @@ static int __maybe_unused pch_spi_resume(struct device *dev)
>
>         dev_dbg(dev, "%s ENTRY\n", __func__);
>
> -       device_wakeup_disable(dev);
> -
>         /* set suspend status to false */
>         pd_dev_save->board_dat->suspend_sts = false;
>
> --
> 2.27.0
>


-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ