linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 3/6] ASoC: amd: SND_SOC_RT5682

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <DM5PR1201MB01391B60AEC0CAE461124DF7E7730@DM5PR1201MB0139.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Tue, 28 Jul 2020 15:39:47 +0000
From:   "RAVULAPATI, VISHNU VARDHAN RAO" 
        <Vishnuvardhanrao.Ravulapati@....com>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
CC:     Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
        "moderated list:SOUND - SOC LAYER / DYNAMIC AUDIO POWER MANAGEM..." 
        <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/6] ASoC: amd: SND_SOC_RT5682_I2C does not build rt5682

I will drop this patch series and will send new series.

Thanks,

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> 
Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2020 9:06 PM
To: RAVULAPATI, VISHNU VARDHAN RAO <Vishnuvardhanrao.Ravulapati@....com>
Cc: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>; moderated list:SOUND - SOC LAYER / DYNAMIC AUDIO POWER MANAGEM... <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>; Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>; Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>; open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>; YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>; Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>; Deucher, Alexander <Alexander.Deucher@....com>; Mukunda, Vijendar <Vijendar.Mukunda@....com>; Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>; Agrawal, Akshu <Akshu.Agrawal@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] ASoC: amd: SND_SOC_RT5682_I2C does not build rt5682

On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 03:24:42PM +0000, RAVULAPATI, VISHNU VARDHAN RAO wrote:
> [AMD Official Use Only - Internal Distribution Only]
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2020 5:48 PM

I'm not seeing any new text in here?

> To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>; RAVULAPATI, VISHNU VARDHAN RAO 
> <Vishnuvardhanrao.Ravulapati@....com>
> Cc: moderated list:SOUND - SOC LAYER / DYNAMIC AUDIO POWER MANAGEM... 
> <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>; Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>; Liam 
> Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>; open list 
> <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>; YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>; 
> Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>; Deucher, Alexander 
> <Alexander.Deucher@....com>; Mukunda, Vijendar 
> <Vijendar.Mukunda@....com>; Enric Balletbo i Serra 
> <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>; Agrawal, Akshu <Akshu.Agrawal@....com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] ASoC: amd: SND_SOC_RT5682_I2C does not build 
> rt5682
> 
> 
> 
> On 7/28/20 7:07 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 06:59:50AM +0000, RAVULAPATI, VISHNU VARDHAN RAO wrote:
> >
> >> So Actually for rt5682 codec Now in 5.8 there are three flags :
> >> SND_SOC_RT5682
> >> SND_SOC_RT5682_I2C
> >> SND_SOC_RT5682_SDW
> >
> >> But till 5.7.8 we have
> >> SND_SOC_RT5682
> >> SND_SOC_RT5682_SDW
> >
> >> So in our design we were using SND_SOC_RT5682 which build 
> >> snd_soc_rt5682.ko Creates the respective codec_dais as defined in 
> >> that .ko
> >
> >> If we use SND_SOC_RT5682_I2C we get snd_soc_rt5682_I2c.ko , it is not creating the expected codec_dai links.
> >
> > Could you be more specific about the way in which "it is not 
> > creating the expected codec_dai links" please?  What are you 
> > expecting to happen and what happens instead?  Do you see any error messages for example?
> >
> >> As there are three flags defined in codecs, I expect that previous 
> >> one which we were using(SND_SOC_RT5682) is not a wrong flag and I 
> >> expect to use
> >> SND_SOC_RT5682 as it is still available.
> >
> > Given that the core module does not register with any bus it is 
> > difficult to see how that could possibly work - the core module 
> > doesn't contain a driver at all.  Have you tested this change?
> 
> I share Mark's point. Have you tested this change on top of Mark's tree, or only on top of the stable kernel?
> Ok. I will drop that patch and send the other series.
> 
> Thanks,
>