| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1fd45e69-3a50-aae8-bcc4-47d891a5e263@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 23:39:31 +0800
From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...dex-team.ru>,
Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com>,
Yang Shi <yang.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
Rong Chen <rong.a.chen@...el.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v17 17/21] mm/lru: replace pgdat lru_lock with lruvec lock
在 2020/7/28 上午7:34, Alexander Duyck 写道:
> It might make more sense to look at modifying
> compact_unlock_should_abort and compact_lock_irqsave (which always
> returns true so should probably be a void) to address the deficiencies
> they have that make them unusable for you.
One of possible reuse for the func compact_unlock_should_abort, could be
like the following, the locked parameter reused different in 2 places.
but, it's seems no this style usage in kernel, isn't it?
Thanks
Alex
>From 41d5ce6562f20f74bc6ac2db83e226ac28d56e90 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 21:19:32 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] compaction polishing
Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>
---
mm/compaction.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------------
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
index c28a43481f01..36fce988de3e 100644
--- a/mm/compaction.c
+++ b/mm/compaction.c
@@ -479,20 +479,20 @@ static bool test_and_set_skip(struct compact_control *cc, struct page *page,
*
* Always returns true which makes it easier to track lock state in callers.
*/
-static bool compact_lock_irqsave(spinlock_t *lock, unsigned long *flags,
+static void compact_lock_irqsave(spinlock_t *lock, unsigned long *flags,
struct compact_control *cc)
__acquires(lock)
{
/* Track if the lock is contended in async mode */
if (cc->mode == MIGRATE_ASYNC && !cc->contended) {
if (spin_trylock_irqsave(lock, *flags))
- return true;
+ return;
cc->contended = true;
}
spin_lock_irqsave(lock, *flags);
- return true;
+ return;
}
/*
@@ -511,11 +511,11 @@ static bool compact_lock_irqsave(spinlock_t *lock, unsigned long *flags,
* scheduled)
*/
static bool compact_unlock_should_abort(spinlock_t *lock,
- unsigned long flags, bool *locked, struct compact_control *cc)
+ unsigned long flags, void **locked, struct compact_control *cc)
{
if (*locked) {
spin_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags);
- *locked = false;
+ *locked = NULL;
}
if (fatal_signal_pending(current)) {
@@ -543,7 +543,7 @@ static unsigned long isolate_freepages_block(struct compact_control *cc,
int nr_scanned = 0, total_isolated = 0;
struct page *cursor;
unsigned long flags = 0;
- bool locked = false;
+ struct compact_control *locked = NULL;
unsigned long blockpfn = *start_pfn;
unsigned int order;
@@ -565,7 +565,7 @@ static unsigned long isolate_freepages_block(struct compact_control *cc,
*/
if (!(blockpfn % SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX)
&& compact_unlock_should_abort(&cc->zone->lock, flags,
- &locked, cc))
+ (void**)&locked, cc))
break;
nr_scanned++;
@@ -599,8 +599,8 @@ static unsigned long isolate_freepages_block(struct compact_control *cc,
* recheck as well.
*/
if (!locked) {
- locked = compact_lock_irqsave(&cc->zone->lock,
- &flags, cc);
+ compact_lock_irqsave(&cc->zone->lock, &flags, cc);
+ locked = cc;
/* Recheck this is a buddy page under lock */
if (!PageBuddy(page))
@@ -787,7 +787,7 @@ static bool too_many_isolated(pg_data_t *pgdat)
unsigned long nr_scanned = 0, nr_isolated = 0;
struct lruvec *lruvec;
unsigned long flags = 0;
- struct lruvec *locked_lruvec = NULL;
+ struct lruvec *locked = NULL;
struct page *page = NULL, *valid_page = NULL;
unsigned long start_pfn = low_pfn;
bool skip_on_failure = false;
@@ -847,21 +847,11 @@ static bool too_many_isolated(pg_data_t *pgdat)
* contention, to give chance to IRQs. Abort completely if
* a fatal signal is pending.
*/
- if (!(low_pfn % SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX)) {
- if (locked_lruvec) {
- unlock_page_lruvec_irqrestore(locked_lruvec,
- flags);
- locked_lruvec = NULL;
- }
-
- if (fatal_signal_pending(current)) {
- cc->contended = true;
-
- low_pfn = 0;
- goto fatal_pending;
- }
-
- cond_resched();
+ if (!(low_pfn % SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX)
+ && compact_unlock_should_abort(&locked->lru_lock, flags,
+ (void**)&locked, cc)) {
+ low_pfn = 0;
+ goto fatal_pending;
}
if (!pfn_valid_within(low_pfn))
@@ -932,9 +922,9 @@ static bool too_many_isolated(pg_data_t *pgdat)
*/
if (unlikely(__PageMovable(page)) &&
!PageIsolated(page)) {
- if (locked_lruvec) {
- unlock_page_lruvec_irqrestore(locked_lruvec, flags);
- locked_lruvec = NULL;
+ if (locked) {
+ unlock_page_lruvec_irqrestore(locked, flags);
+ locked = NULL;
}
if (!isolate_movable_page(page, isolate_mode))
@@ -979,13 +969,13 @@ static bool too_many_isolated(pg_data_t *pgdat)
lruvec = mem_cgroup_page_lruvec(page, pgdat);
/* If we already hold the lock, we can skip some rechecking */
- if (lruvec != locked_lruvec) {
- if (locked_lruvec)
- unlock_page_lruvec_irqrestore(locked_lruvec,
+ if (lruvec != locked) {
+ if (locked)
+ unlock_page_lruvec_irqrestore(locked,
flags);
compact_lock_irqsave(&lruvec->lru_lock, &flags, cc);
- locked_lruvec = lruvec;
+ locked = lruvec;
rcu_read_unlock();
lruvec_memcg_debug(lruvec, page);
@@ -1041,9 +1031,9 @@ static bool too_many_isolated(pg_data_t *pgdat)
isolate_fail_put:
/* Avoid potential deadlock in freeing page under lru_lock */
- if (locked_lruvec) {
- unlock_page_lruvec_irqrestore(locked_lruvec, flags);
- locked_lruvec = NULL;
+ if (locked) {
+ unlock_page_lruvec_irqrestore(locked, flags);
+ locked = NULL;
}
put_page(page);
@@ -1057,10 +1047,9 @@ static bool too_many_isolated(pg_data_t *pgdat)
* page anyway.
*/
if (nr_isolated) {
- if (locked_lruvec) {
- unlock_page_lruvec_irqrestore(locked_lruvec,
- flags);
- locked_lruvec = NULL;
+ if (locked) {
+ unlock_page_lruvec_irqrestore(locked, flags);
+ locked = NULL;
}
putback_movable_pages(&cc->migratepages);
cc->nr_migratepages = 0;
@@ -1087,8 +1076,8 @@ static bool too_many_isolated(pg_data_t *pgdat)
page = NULL;
isolate_abort:
- if (locked_lruvec)
- unlock_page_lruvec_irqrestore(locked_lruvec, flags);
+ if (locked)
+ unlock_page_lruvec_irqrestore(locked, flags);
if (page) {
SetPageLRU(page);
put_page(page);
--
1.8.3.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists