[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPRy4h2Zbw=QwJ7=0+FzGnK_o1esn2GTRSuv5ZE30Vu=Oj=x=Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 22:13:22 +0530
From: Dhiraj Sharma <dhiraj.sharma0024@...il.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, arnd@...db.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>,
stern@...land.harvard.edu, jrdr.linux@...il.com,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: usbvision: fixed coding style
> As the bot said, only do one type of thing per patch, and "fix all
> checkpatch errors/warnings" is not one type of thing.
So should I send a fresh patch with minimal fixes? instead of replying
to this mail with [PATCH 01]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists