linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] media: usbvision: fixed coding style

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 28 Jul 2020 22:13:22 +0530
From:   Dhiraj Sharma <dhiraj.sharma0024@...il.com>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, arnd@...db.de,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>,
        stern@...land.harvard.edu, jrdr.linux@...il.com,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: usbvision: fixed coding style

> As the bot said, only do one type of thing per patch, and "fix all
> checkpatch errors/warnings" is not one type of thing.

So should I send a fresh patch with minimal fixes? instead of replying
to this mail with [PATCH 01]