linux-kernel - [PATCH v3 20/21] x86/kaslr: Make local variables 64-bit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200728225722.67457-21-nivedita@alum.mit.edu>
Date:   Tue, 28 Jul 2020 18:57:21 -0400
From:   Arvind Sankar <nivedita@...m.mit.edu>
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, x86@...nel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 20/21] x86/kaslr: Make local variables 64-bit

Change the type of local variables/fields that store mem_vector
addresses to u64 to make it less likely that 32-bit overflow will cause
issues on 32-bit.

Signed-off-by: Arvind Sankar <nivedita@...m.mit.edu>
---
 arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c | 13 +++++++------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c
index c49d479245d0..38ecbf2e61c5 100644
--- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c
+++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c
@@ -461,7 +461,7 @@ static bool mem_avoid_overlap(struct mem_vector *img,
 {
 	int i;
 	struct setup_data *ptr;
-	unsigned long earliest = img->start + img->size;
+	u64 earliest = img->start + img->size;
 	bool is_overlapping = false;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < MEM_AVOID_MAX; i++) {
@@ -506,7 +506,7 @@ static bool mem_avoid_overlap(struct mem_vector *img,
 }
 
 struct slot_area {
-	unsigned long addr;
+	u64 addr;
 	unsigned long num;
 };
 
@@ -537,7 +537,8 @@ static void store_slot_info(struct mem_vector *region, unsigned long image_size)
 static void
 process_gb_huge_pages(struct mem_vector *region, unsigned long image_size)
 {
-	unsigned long pud_start, pud_end, gb_huge_pages;
+	u64 pud_start, pud_end;
+	unsigned long gb_huge_pages;
 	struct mem_vector tmp;
 
 	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_64) || !max_gb_huge_pages) {
@@ -578,7 +579,7 @@ process_gb_huge_pages(struct mem_vector *region, unsigned long image_size)
 	}
 }
 
-static unsigned long slots_fetch_random(void)
+static u64 slots_fetch_random(void)
 {
 	unsigned long slot;
 	unsigned int i;
@@ -594,7 +595,7 @@ static unsigned long slots_fetch_random(void)
 			slot -= slot_areas[i].num;
 			continue;
 		}
-		return slot_areas[i].addr + slot * CONFIG_PHYSICAL_ALIGN;
+		return slot_areas[i].addr + ((u64)slot * CONFIG_PHYSICAL_ALIGN);
 	}
 
 	if (i == slot_area_index)
@@ -607,7 +608,7 @@ static void __process_mem_region(struct mem_vector *entry,
 				 unsigned long image_size)
 {
 	struct mem_vector region, overlap;
-	unsigned long region_end;
+	u64 region_end;
 
 	/* Enforce minimum and memory limit. */
 	region.start = max_t(u64, entry->start, minimum);
-- 
2.26.2