[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200728225722.67457-17-nivedita@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 18:57:17 -0400
From: Arvind Sankar <nivedita@...m.mit.edu>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, x86@...nel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 16/21] x86/kaslr: Drop unnecessary alignment in find_random_virt_addr
Drop unnecessary alignment of image_size to CONFIG_PHYSICAL_ALIGN in
find_random_virt_addr, it cannot change the result: the largest valid
slot is the largest n that satisfies
minimum + n * CONFIG_PHYSICAL_ALIGN + image_size <= KERNEL_IMAGE_SIZE
(since minimum is already aligned) and so n is equal to
(KERNEL_IMAGE_SIZE - minimum - image_size) / CONFIG_PHYSICAL_ALIGN
even if image_size is not aligned to CONFIG_PHYSICAL_ALIGN.
Signed-off-by: Arvind Sankar <nivedita@...m.mit.edu>
---
arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c | 6 +-----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c
index 2f43b0d7051e..4fd60eff048f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c
+++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c
@@ -824,16 +824,12 @@ static unsigned long find_random_virt_addr(unsigned long minimum,
{
unsigned long slots, random_addr;
- /* Align image_size for easy slot calculations. */
- image_size = ALIGN(image_size, CONFIG_PHYSICAL_ALIGN);
-
/*
* There are how many CONFIG_PHYSICAL_ALIGN-sized slots
* that can hold image_size within the range of minimum to
* KERNEL_IMAGE_SIZE?
*/
- slots = (KERNEL_IMAGE_SIZE - minimum - image_size) /
- CONFIG_PHYSICAL_ALIGN + 1;
+ slots = 1 + (KERNEL_IMAGE_SIZE - minimum - image_size) / CONFIG_PHYSICAL_ALIGN;
random_addr = kaslr_get_random_long("Virtual") % slots;
--
2.26.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists