[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c7c752bc-2a06-fc56-6f87-dfdddd8a436e@codeaurora.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 13:56:21 +0530
From: Sivaprakash Murugesan <sivaprak@...eaurora.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Cc: Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ansuel Smith <ansuelsmth@...il.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the devicetree tree with the pci tree
On 7/28/2020 11:19 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the devicetree tree got a conflict in:
>
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie.txt
>
> between commits:
>
> 736ae5c91712 ("dt-bindings: PCI: qcom: Add missing clks")
> b11b8cc161de ("dt-bindings: PCI: qcom: Add ext reset")
> d511580ea9c2 ("dt-bindings: PCI: qcom: Add ipq8064 rev 2 variant")
>
> from the pci tree and commit:
>
> 70172d196947 ("dt-bindings: pci: convert QCOM pci bindings to YAML")
>
> from the devicetree tree.
>
> I don;t know how to fixed it up so I just left the latter one . This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
Rob/Bjorn,
Please let me know if I can provide a patch rebased to linux-next.
Bjorn can pick up the patch after review and Rob can drop the old pci
yaml conversion patch.
let me know your thoughts.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists