[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <159592494608.1360974.13925720722764973592@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 01:29:06 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
To: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@...eaurora.org>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
Cc: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@...eaurora.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, coresight@...ts.linaro.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] coresight: etm4x: Fix etm4_count race by moving cpuhp callbacks to init
Quoting Sai Prakash Ranjan (2020-07-28 00:51:02)
> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.c
> index 6d7d2169bfb2..adb71987a1e3 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.c
> @@ -48,8 +48,6 @@ module_param(pm_save_enable, int, 0444);
> MODULE_PARM_DESC(pm_save_enable,
> "Save/restore state on power down: 1 = never, 2 = self-hosted");
>
> -/* The number of ETMv4 currently registered */
> -static int etm4_count;
> static struct etmv4_drvdata *etmdrvdata[NR_CPUS];
> static void etm4_set_default_config(struct etmv4_config *config);
> static int etm4_set_event_filters(struct etmv4_drvdata *drvdata,
> @@ -1403,12 +1401,9 @@ static int etm4_pm_setup_cpuslocked(void)
Is this only called from __init now? If so please mark it as __init
then.
> {
> int ret;
>
> - if (etm4_count++)
> - return 0;
> -
> ret = cpu_pm_register_notifier(&etm4_cpu_pm_nb);
> if (ret)
> - goto reduce_count;
> + return ret;
>
> ret = cpuhp_setup_state_nocalls_cpuslocked(CPUHP_AP_ARM_CORESIGHT_STARTING,
> "arm/coresight4:starting",
> @@ -1432,17 +1427,11 @@ static int etm4_pm_setup_cpuslocked(void)
>
> unregister_notifier:
> cpu_pm_unregister_notifier(&etm4_cpu_pm_nb);
> -
> -reduce_count:
> - --etm4_count;
> return ret;
> }
>
> static void etm4_pm_clear(void)
This is __init too?
> {
> - if (--etm4_count != 0)
> - return;
> -
> cpu_pm_unregister_notifier(&etm4_cpu_pm_nb);
> cpuhp_remove_state_nocalls(CPUHP_AP_ARM_CORESIGHT_STARTING);
> if (hp_online) {
> @@ -1598,4 +1576,29 @@ static struct amba_driver etm4x_driver = {
> .probe = etm4_probe,
> .id_table = etm4_ids,
> };
> -builtin_amba_driver(etm4x_driver);
> +
> +static int __init etm4x_init(void)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + cpus_read_lock();
> + ret = etm4_pm_setup_cpuslocked();
> + cpus_read_unlock();
> +
> + /* etm4_pm_setup_cpuslocked() does its own cleanup - exit on error */
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + ret = amba_driver_register(&etm4x_driver);
> + if (ret) {
> + pr_info("Error registering etm4x driver\n");
Use pr_err() please.
> + goto err_init;
> + }
> +
> + return ret;
> +
> +err_init:
Why is this a goto?
> + etm4_pm_clear();
> + return ret;
Instead of just putting this in the if (ret) arm?
> +}
> +module_init(etm4x_init);
It was device_initcall before with builtin_amba_driver(), best to not
change that.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists