[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200728110809.19228-1-dwagner@suse.de>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 13:08:09 +0200
From: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@...e.de>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Daniel Wagner <dwagner@...e.de>
Subject: [RFC] block: Allocate only 1 tag set for a kdump kernel
Do not update nr_hw_queues again after setting it to 1 for a kdump
kernel. This avoids allocating a tag set of size nr_cpu_ids and but
then just using one tag set.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@...e.de>
---
Hi,
I stumbled across this and didn't make sense to me that we might
allocated more tag sets than we potently use. But maybe I am
not seeing the obvious thing.
Only compiled tested.
Thanks,
Daniel
block/blk-mq.c | 15 ++++++++-------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index 4f57d27bfa73..e32cb0217135 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -3291,13 +3291,14 @@ int blk_mq_alloc_tag_set(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set)
set->nr_hw_queues = 1;
set->nr_maps = 1;
set->queue_depth = min(64U, set->queue_depth);
+ } else {
+ /*
+ * There is no use for more h/w queues than cpus
+ * if we just have a single map
+ */
+ if (set->nr_maps == 1 && set->nr_hw_queues > nr_cpu_ids)
+ set->nr_hw_queues = nr_cpu_ids;
}
- /*
- * There is no use for more h/w queues than cpus if we just have
- * a single map
- */
- if (set->nr_maps == 1 && set->nr_hw_queues > nr_cpu_ids)
- set->nr_hw_queues = nr_cpu_ids;
if (blk_mq_realloc_tag_set_tags(set, 0, set->nr_hw_queues) < 0)
return -ENOMEM;
@@ -3309,7 +3310,7 @@ int blk_mq_alloc_tag_set(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set)
GFP_KERNEL, set->numa_node);
if (!set->map[i].mq_map)
goto out_free_mq_map;
- set->map[i].nr_queues = is_kdump_kernel() ? 1 : set->nr_hw_queues;
+ set->map[i].nr_queues = set->nr_hw_queues;
}
ret = blk_mq_update_queue_map(set);
--
2.16.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists