lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 29 Jul 2020 16:47:36 -0700
From:   Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
To:     Wang ShaoBo <bobo.shaobowang@...wei.com>
Cc:     cj.chengjian@...wei.com, Li Bin <huawei.libin@...wei.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-perf-users <linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] tools build: Check return value of fwrite_unlocked
 in jvmti_agent.c

On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 3:07 AM Wang ShaoBo <bobo.shaobowang@...wei.com> wrote:
>
> Function jvmti_write_code called by compiled_method_load_cb may return
> error in using fwrite_unlocked, this failure should be captured and
> warned.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wang ShaoBo <bobo.shaobowang@...wei.com>
> ---
>  tools/perf/jvmti/jvmti_agent.c | 23 +++++++++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/jvmti/jvmti_agent.c b/tools/perf/jvmti/jvmti_agent.c
> index 88108598d6e9..a1fe6aa16b6d 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/jvmti/jvmti_agent.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/jvmti/jvmti_agent.c
> @@ -363,7 +363,7 @@ jvmti_write_code(void *agent, char const *sym,
>         struct jr_code_load rec;
>         size_t sym_len;
>         FILE *fp = agent;
> -       int ret = -1;
> +       int ret;
>
>         /* don't care about 0 length function, no samples */
>         if (size == 0)
> @@ -401,16 +401,23 @@ jvmti_write_code(void *agent, char const *sym,
>         rec.code_index = code_generation++;
>
>         ret = fwrite_unlocked(&rec, sizeof(rec), 1, fp);
> -       fwrite_unlocked(sym, sym_len, 1, fp);
> +       if (ret)
> +               goto error;

Sorry, it seems I lost a reply to this. Won't ret here be the number
of items written and not an error code? Consequently all writes will
immediately goto error?

Thanks,
Ian

> +       ret = fwrite_unlocked(sym, sym_len, 1, fp);
> +       if (ret)
> +               goto error;
>
> -       if (code)
> -               fwrite_unlocked(code, size, 1, fp);
> +       if (code) {
> +               ret = fwrite_unlocked(code, size, 1, fp);
> +               if (ret)
> +                       goto error;
> +       }
>
>         funlockfile(fp);
> -
> -       ret = 0;
> -
> -       return ret;
> +       return 0;
> +error:
> +       funlockfile(fp);
> +       return -1;
>  }
>
>  int
> --
> 2.17.1
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ