[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1596010313.11360.2.camel@mhfsdcap03>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 16:11:53 +0800
From: Crystal Guo <crystal.guo@...iatek.com>
To: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
CC: "linux@...ck-us.net" <linux@...ck-us.net>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
srv_heupstream <srv_heupstream@...iatek.com>,
"linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org" <linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org>,
Seiya Wang (王迺君)
<seiya.wang@...iatek.com>,
Erin Lo (羅雅齡)
<erin.lo@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [v2,2/3] dt-bindings: watchdog: add a new head file for toprgu
reset-controllers
On Wed, 2020-07-29 at 15:42 +0800, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> Hi Crystal,
>
> On 29/07/2020 08:30, Crystal Guo wrote:
> > merge all the reset numbers in one head file.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Crystal Guo <crystal.guo@...iatek.com>
> > ---
> > include/dt-bindings/reset-controller/mtk-resets.h | 13 +++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/reset-controller/mtk-resets.h
> >
> > diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/reset-controller/mtk-resets.h b/include/dt-bindings/reset-controller/mtk-resets.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..d73a4ba
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/include/dt-bindings/reset-controller/mtk-resets.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
> > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> > +/*
> > + * Copyright (C) 2020 Mediatek Inc.
> > + *
> > + */
> > +
> > +#ifndef _DT_BINDINGS_RESET_CONTROLLER_MTK
> > +#define _DT_BINDINGS_RESET_CONTROLLER_MTK
> > +
> > +#define MT2712_TOPRGU_SW_RST_NUM 11
> > +#define MT8183_TOPRGU_SW_RST_NUM 19
>
> Maybe I didn't explain myself properly. We want to have all resets in one file
> and do not want to have the resets for the watchdog in a different file. That
> means I don't thin your patch is correct and the effort should be abandoned.
>
> Regards,
> Matthias
Do you mean to keep the current way unchanged? For example, with a new
SOC 8192, should add a new head file mt8192_resets.h for the resets
numbers.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists