[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <72d317ef-7f69-9e61-b1d5-23d660c58560@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 10:15:12 +0200
From: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
To: Crystal Guo <crystal.guo@...iatek.com>
Cc: "linux@...ck-us.net" <linux@...ck-us.net>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
srv_heupstream <srv_heupstream@...iatek.com>,
"linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org" <linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org>,
Seiya Wang (王迺君)
<seiya.wang@...iatek.com>,
Erin Lo (羅雅齡) <erin.lo@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [v2,2/3] dt-bindings: watchdog: add a new head file for toprgu
reset-controllers
On 29/07/2020 10:11, Crystal Guo wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-07-29 at 15:42 +0800, Matthias Brugger wrote:
>> Hi Crystal,
>>
>> On 29/07/2020 08:30, Crystal Guo wrote:
>>> merge all the reset numbers in one head file.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Crystal Guo <crystal.guo@...iatek.com>
>>> ---
>>> include/dt-bindings/reset-controller/mtk-resets.h | 13 +++++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
>>> create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/reset-controller/mtk-resets.h
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/reset-controller/mtk-resets.h b/include/dt-bindings/reset-controller/mtk-resets.h
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 0000000..d73a4ba
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/reset-controller/mtk-resets.h
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
>>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
>>> +/*
>>> + * Copyright (C) 2020 Mediatek Inc.
>>> + *
>>> + */
>>> +
>>> +#ifndef _DT_BINDINGS_RESET_CONTROLLER_MTK
>>> +#define _DT_BINDINGS_RESET_CONTROLLER_MTK
>>> +
>>> +#define MT2712_TOPRGU_SW_RST_NUM 11
>>> +#define MT8183_TOPRGU_SW_RST_NUM 19
>>
>> Maybe I didn't explain myself properly. We want to have all resets in one file
>> and do not want to have the resets for the watchdog in a different file. That
>> means I don't thin your patch is correct and the effort should be abandoned.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Matthias
>
> Do you mean to keep the current way unchanged? For example, with a new
> SOC 8192, should add a new head file mt8192_resets.h for the resets
> numbers.
>
Exactly.
Regards,
Matthias
Powered by blists - more mailing lists