[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5bfad7df-ee64-f94a-003b-06320b9fad0f@inbox.ru>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 11:26:51 +0300
From: Maxim Kochetkov <fido_max@...ox.ru>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: bigunclemax@...il.com, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: adc: ti-ads1015: fix conversion when CONFIG_PM is
not set
In case of CONFIG_PM is not set:
static inline int __pm_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev, int rpmflags)
{
return -ENOSYS;
}
and ads1015_read_raw failed at:
ret = ads1015_set_power_state(data, false);
if (ret < 0)
goto release_direct;
29.07.2020 11:21, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 10:59:07AM +0300, Maxim Kochetkov wrote:
>> To stop conversion ads1015_set_power_state function use unimplemented
>> function pm_runtime_put_autosuspend if CONFIG_PM is not set.
>> If CONFIG_PM is disabled, there is no need to start/stop conversion.
>> Fix it by adding return 0 function variant if CONFIG_PM is not set.
>
> I'm wondering if you check the real code (assembly) for any difference.
>
> All calls AFAICS are statically defined in !CONFIG_PM case and compiler/linker
> should be clever enough to drop this completely. Isn't it the case?
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists