[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200729083419.GM3703480@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 11:34:19 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Maxim Kochetkov <fido_max@...ox.ru>
Cc: bigunclemax@...il.com, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: adc: ti-ads1015: fix conversion when CONFIG_PM is
not set
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 11:26:51AM +0300, Maxim Kochetkov wrote:
> In case of CONFIG_PM is not set:
>
> static inline int __pm_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev, int rpmflags)
> {
> return -ENOSYS;
> }
>
> and ads1015_read_raw failed at:
>
> ret = ads1015_set_power_state(data, false);
> if (ret < 0)
> goto release_direct;
>
I see. Please, elaborate all this in the commit message for v2.
P.S. Avoid top postings!
> 29.07.2020 11:21, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 10:59:07AM +0300, Maxim Kochetkov wrote:
> > > To stop conversion ads1015_set_power_state function use unimplemented
> > > function pm_runtime_put_autosuspend if CONFIG_PM is not set.
> > > If CONFIG_PM is disabled, there is no need to start/stop conversion.
> > > Fix it by adding return 0 function variant if CONFIG_PM is not set.
> >
> > I'm wondering if you check the real code (assembly) for any difference.
> >
> > All calls AFAICS are statically defined in !CONFIG_PM case and compiler/linker
> > should be clever enough to drop this completely. Isn't it the case?
> >
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists