[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200729171650.GA250741@nvidia.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 14:16:50 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
CC: Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next 0/4] Fix bugs around RDMA CM destroying state
On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 10:07:03AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> This small series simplifies some of the RDMA CM state transitions
> connected with DESTROYING states and in the process resolves a bug
> discovered by syzkaller.
>
> Thanks
>
> Jason Gunthorpe (4):
> RDMA/cma: Simplify DEVICE_REMOVAL for internal_id
> RDMA/cma: Using the standard locking pattern when delivering the
> removal event
> RDMA/cma: Remove unneeded locking for req paths
> RDMA/cma: Execute rdma_cm destruction from a handler properly
Applied to for-next
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists