[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200731091142.GS6419@phenom.ffwll.local>
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2020 11:11:42 +0200
From: daniel@...ll.ch
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Cc: daniel@...ll.ch, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>, od@...c.me,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Small cleanups to ingenic-drm driver
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 02:28:01AM +0200, Paul Cercueil wrote:
>
>
> Le mer. 29 juil. 2020 à 0:00, daniel@...ll.ch a écrit :
> > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 10:17:36PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > > Hi Paul.
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 05:16:39PM +0200, Paul Cercueil wrote:
> > > > Here are a few cleanups to the ingenic-drm driver.
> > > > - some error paths were missing and have been added;
> > > > - the mode validation has been moved to the .mode_valid helper
> > > callback.
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > -Paul
> > > >
> > > > Paul Cercueil (2):
> > > > drm/ingenic: Handle errors of drm_atomic_get_plane_state
> > > > drm/ingenic: Validate mode in a .mode_valid callback
> > >
> > > Both looks fine, you can add my:
> > > Reviewed-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
> > >
> > > I assume you will apply the patches.
> > > Maybe wait for Daniel to take a look, he had some feedback on where
> > > to add checks. I assume this is covered by the second patch.
> >
> > Yeah changelog for new versions would be great, but aside from that
> > bickering patch 2 lgtm now.
>
> This patchset is V1, I'm fixing issues you saw in the ingenic-drm driver
> when reviewing a different patchset.
Oh right that was pre-existing issue in which callback to use, apologies
for the confusion.
-Daniel
>
> Thanks for the review, I'll apply now.
>
> -Paul
> >
>
>
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
Powered by blists - more mailing lists