lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0gk9a-PVr4+zerNWdBORyC563K8XgUdgxENAQ+Y5-85tg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 31 Jul 2020 13:33:24 +0200
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To:     Neal Liu <neal.liu@...iatek.com>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-tegra <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC..." 
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        wsd_upstream <wsd_upstream@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] acpi: fix 'return' with no value build warning

On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 5:39 AM Neal Liu <neal.liu@...iatek.com> wrote:
>
> Fixing CFI issue which introduced by commit efe9711214e6 is
> incomplete.
> Add return value to fix return-type build warning.
>
> Signed-off-by: Neal Liu <neal.liu@...iatek.com>

Applied with edited subject and changelog, but ->

> ---
>  drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c |    4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
> index 6ffb6c9..6870020 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
> @@ -664,11 +664,11 @@ static int acpi_idle_enter_s2idle(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
>                 struct acpi_processor *pr = __this_cpu_read(processors);
>
>                 if (unlikely(!pr))
> -                       return;
> +                       return -EFAULT;

-> there is no point returning an error code here, so I've made it
just return 0.

>
>                 if (pr->flags.bm_check) {
>                         acpi_idle_enter_bm(pr, cx, false);
> -                       return;
> +                       return 0;
>                 } else {
>                         ACPI_FLUSH_CPU_CACHE();
>                 }
> --

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ