[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200802114044.GD4705@intel.intel>
Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2020 14:40:44 +0300
From: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...el.com>
To: Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>, <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
<rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>, <airlied@...ux.ie>, <daniel@...ll.ch>,
<chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>, <matthew.auld@...el.com>,
<tvrtko.ursulin@...el.com>, <mika.kuoppala@...ux.intel.com>,
<intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<tianjia.zhang@...baba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix wrong return value
Hi Tianjia,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
> index d960d0be5bd2..cc017e3cc9c5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
> @@ -758,7 +758,7 @@ int i915_active_acquire_preallocate_barrier(struct i915_active *ref,
> intel_engine_mask_t tmp, mask = engine->mask;
> struct llist_node *first = NULL, *last = NULL;
> struct intel_gt *gt = engine->gt;
> - int err;
> + int err = 0;
you don't need the initialization here.
Thanks,
Andi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists