[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <159636908251.23037.6183292610375916917@build.alporthouse.com>
Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2020 12:51:22 +0100
From: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
To: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...el.com>,
Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, airlied@...ux.ie,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tianjia.zhang@...baba.com, matthew.auld@...el.com
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix wrong return value
Quoting Andi Shyti (2020-08-02 12:40:44)
> Hi Tianjia,
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
> > index d960d0be5bd2..cc017e3cc9c5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
> > @@ -758,7 +758,7 @@ int i915_active_acquire_preallocate_barrier(struct i915_active *ref,
> > intel_engine_mask_t tmp, mask = engine->mask;
> > struct llist_node *first = NULL, *last = NULL;
> > struct intel_gt *gt = engine->gt;
> > - int err;
> > + int err = 0;
>
> you don't need the initialization here.
But it's close enough that I can munge the patch inline.
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
-Chris
Powered by blists - more mailing lists