[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200802115422.GB1090@bug>
Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2020 13:54:22 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc: Roy Im <roy.im.opensource@...semi.com>,
Uwe Kleine-Koenig <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
Brian Masney <masneyb@...tation.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, Luca Weiss <luca@...tu.xyz>,
Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@...il.com>,
Pascal PAILLET-LME <p.paillet@...com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Support Opensource <support.opensource@...semi.com>,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v18 3/3] Input: new da7280 haptic driver
Hi!
> > +static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(ps_seq_id);
> > +static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(ps_seq_loop);
> > +static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(gpi_seq_id0);
> > +static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(gpi_seq_id1);
> > +static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(gpi_seq_id2);
> > +static DEVICE_ATTR_WO(patterns);
>
> Should this be a binary attribute instead of having string parsing in
> the kernel?
Plus... is this suitable userland interface? Should it be documetned?
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists