[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200803161230.GB23808@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2020 17:12:30 +0100
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
Cc: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@...gle.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
DRI mailing list <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Hridya Valsaraju <hridya@...gle.com>,
Ioannis Ilkos <ilkos@...gle.com>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
kernel-team <kernel-team@...roid.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] dmabuf/tracing: Add dma-buf trace events
On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 09:00:00AM -0700, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 8:41 AM Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 02:47:19PM +0000, Kalesh Singh wrote:
> > > +static void dma_buf_fd_install(int fd, struct file *filp)
> > > +{
> > > + trace_dma_buf_fd_ref_inc(current, filp);
> > > +}
> >
> > You're adding a new file_operation in order to just add a new tracepoint?
> > NACK.
>
> Hi Matthew,
> The plan is to attach a BPF to this tracepoint in order to track
> dma-buf users. If you feel this is an overkill, what would you suggest
> as an alternative?
I'm sure BPF can attach to fd_install and filter on file->f_ops belonging
to dma_buf, for example.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists