[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJuCfpFLikjaoopvt+vGN3W=m9auoK+DLQNgUf-xUbYfC=83Mw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2020 09:00:00 -0700
From: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@...gle.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
DRI mailing list <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Hridya Valsaraju <hridya@...gle.com>,
Ioannis Ilkos <ilkos@...gle.com>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
kernel-team <kernel-team@...roid.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] dmabuf/tracing: Add dma-buf trace events
On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 8:41 AM Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 02:47:19PM +0000, Kalesh Singh wrote:
> > +static void dma_buf_fd_install(int fd, struct file *filp)
> > +{
> > + trace_dma_buf_fd_ref_inc(current, filp);
> > +}
>
> You're adding a new file_operation in order to just add a new tracepoint?
> NACK.
Hi Matthew,
The plan is to attach a BPF to this tracepoint in order to track
dma-buf users. If you feel this is an overkill, what would you suggest
as an alternative?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists