[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200803205146.GA16295@amd>
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2020 22:51:46 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Eddie James <eajames@...ux.ibm.com>,
Linux LED Subsystem <linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>,
Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>,
vishwa@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] leds: pca955x: Add an IBM software implementation
of the PCA9552 chip
On Mon 2020-08-03 19:42:17, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 5:51 PM Eddie James <eajames@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > IBM created an implementation of the PCA9552 on a PIC16F
> > microcontroller. The I2C device addresses are different from the
> > hardware PCA9552, so add a new compatible string and associated
> > platform data to be able to probe this device.
>
> ...
>
> > pca9550,
> > pca9551,
> > pca9552,
> > + ibm_pca9552,
> > pca9553,
>
> I would rather not mix like this, but use alpha order, for example.
> It's better to read and see which devices are supported by vendor.
Actually I see no huge reason to change that. pca9552 and ibm_pca9552
should be very similar, so it makes sense to keep them close together.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (182 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists