[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200803165647.296e6f21@xhacker.debian>
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2020 16:56:47 +0800
From: Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@...aptics.com>
To: Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next] net: stmmac: fix failed to suspend if phy based
WOL is enabled
With the latest net-next tree, if test suspend/resume after enabling
WOL, we get error as below:
[ 487.086365] dpm_run_callback(): mdio_bus_suspend+0x0/0x30 returns -16
[ 487.086375] PM: Device stmmac-0:00 failed to suspend: error -16
-16 means -EBUSY, this is because I didn't enable wakeup of the correct
device when implementing phy based WOL feature. To be honest, I caught
the issue when implementing phy based WOL and then fix it locally, but
forgot to amend the phy based wol patch. Today, I found the issue by
testing net-next tree.
Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@...aptics.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_ethtool.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_ethtool.c
index 05d63963fdb7..ac5e8cc5fb9f 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_ethtool.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_ethtool.c
@@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ static int stmmac_set_wol(struct net_device *dev, struct ethtool_wolinfo *wol)
int ret = phylink_ethtool_set_wol(priv->phylink, wol);
if (!ret)
- device_set_wakeup_enable(&dev->dev, !!wol->wolopts);
+ device_set_wakeup_enable(priv->device, !!wol->wolopts);
return ret;
}
--
2.28.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists