linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Module argument to control whether intel-spi-pci attempts to turn the SPI flash chip writeable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAD2FfiFt6=OueX3E0g2ckPU+7F69yCmM0+bzF_6UD1sd4E_k_A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 3 Aug 2020 11:18:12 +0100
From:   Richard Hughes <hughsient@...il.com>
To:     Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Daniel Gutson <daniel.gutson@...ypsium.com>,
        Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...rochip.com>,
        Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
        Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@...nel.org>,
        linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Alex Bazhaniuk <alex@...ypsium.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Module argument to control whether intel-spi-pci attempts
 to turn the SPI flash chip writeable

On Mon, 3 Aug 2020 at 10:57, Mika Westerberg
<mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> I think instead of this we should simply make it so that the driver
> never tries to make the chip writable.

I think this is a good idea, but I wasn't sure if it was an acceptable
behaviour change. Should the driver still try to set BCR_WPD when
writing an image (i.e. defer the setting of write enable until later),
or just not set the BCR register at all? I think your last comment was
the latter, but wanted to check.

Richard.