[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200803102711.GK1375436@lahna.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2020 13:27:11 +0300
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To: Richard Hughes <hughsient@...il.com>
Cc: Daniel Gutson <daniel.gutson@...ypsium.com>,
Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...rochip.com>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@...nel.org>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alex Bazhaniuk <alex@...ypsium.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Module argument to control whether intel-spi-pci
attempts to turn the SPI flash chip writeable
On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 11:18:12AM +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Aug 2020 at 10:57, Mika Westerberg
> <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > I think instead of this we should simply make it so that the driver
> > never tries to make the chip writable.
>
> I think this is a good idea, but I wasn't sure if it was an acceptable
> behaviour change. Should the driver still try to set BCR_WPD when
> writing an image (i.e. defer the setting of write enable until later),
> or just not set the BCR register at all? I think your last comment was
> the latter, but wanted to check.
I would say not set it at all. I think it was (my) mistake to set it in
the first place.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists