linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Module argument to control whether intel-spi-pci attempts to turn the SPI flash chip writeable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 3 Aug 2020 09:58:23 -0300
From:   Daniel Gutson <daniel@...ypsium.com>
To:     Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Richard Hughes <hughsient@...il.com>,
        Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...rochip.com>,
        Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
        Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@...nel.org>,
        linux-mtd <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Alex Bazhaniuk <alex@...ypsium.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Module argument to control whether intel-spi-pci attempts
 to turn the SPI flash chip writeable

On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 7:27 AM Mika Westerberg
<mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 11:18:12AM +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> > On Mon, 3 Aug 2020 at 10:57, Mika Westerberg
> > <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > > I think instead of this we should simply make it so that the driver
> > > never tries to make the chip writable.
> >
> > I think this is a good idea, but I wasn't sure if it was an acceptable
> > behaviour change. Should the driver still try to set BCR_WPD when
> > writing an image (i.e. defer the setting of write enable until later),
> > or just not set the BCR register at all? I think your last comment was
> > the latter, but wanted to check.
>
> I would say not set it at all. I think it was (my) mistake to set it in
> the first place.

Do you want me to remove the module parameter from intel-spi too and
do the same?



-- 
Daniel Gutson
Argentina Site Director
Enginieering Director
Eclypsium

Below The Surface: Get the latest threat research and insights on
firmware and supply chain threats from the research team at Eclypsium.
https://eclypsium.com/research/#threatreport