| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2020 16:27:45 -0500
From: David Dai <zdai@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Leonardo Bras <leobras.c@...il.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@...abs.ru>,
Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>,
Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@...ux.ibm.com>,
Ram Pai <linuxram@...ibm.com>,
Brian King <brking@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/7] powerpc/pseries/iommu: Create defines for
operations in ibm, ddw-applicable
On Thu, 2020-07-16 at 04:16 -0300, Leonardo Bras wrote:
> Create defines to help handling ibm,ddw-applicable values, avoiding
> confusion about the index of given operations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Leonardo Bras <leobras.c@...il.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++------
> ----
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c
> b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c
> index 6d47b4a3ce39..ac0d6376bdad 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c
> @@ -39,6 +39,14 @@
>
> #include "pseries.h"
>
> +enum {
> + DDW_QUERY_PE_DMA_WIN = 0,
> + DDW_CREATE_PE_DMA_WIN = 1,
> + DDW_REMOVE_PE_DMA_WIN = 2,
> +
> + DDW_APPLICABLE_SIZE
> +};
> +
> static struct iommu_table_group *iommu_pseries_alloc_group(int node)
> {
> struct iommu_table_group *table_group;
> @@ -771,12 +779,12 @@ static void remove_ddw(struct device_node *np,
> bool remove_prop)
> {
> struct dynamic_dma_window_prop *dwp;
> struct property *win64;
> - u32 ddw_avail[3];
> + u32 ddw_avail[DDW_APPLICABLE_SIZE];
> u64 liobn;
> int ret = 0;
>
> ret = of_property_read_u32_array(np, "ibm,ddw-applicable",
> - &ddw_avail[0], 3);
> + &ddw_avail[0],
> DDW_APPLICABLE_SIZE);
>
> win64 = of_find_property(np, DIRECT64_PROPNAME, NULL);
> if (!win64)
> @@ -798,15 +806,15 @@ static void remove_ddw(struct device_node *np,
> bool remove_prop)
> pr_debug("%pOF successfully cleared tces in window.\n",
> np);
>
> - ret = rtas_call(ddw_avail[2], 1, 1, NULL, liobn);
> + ret = rtas_call(ddw_avail[DDW_REMOVE_PE_DMA_WIN], 1, 1, NULL,
> liobn);
> if (ret)
> pr_warn("%pOF: failed to remove direct window: rtas
> returned "
> "%d to ibm,remove-pe-dma-window(%x) %llx\n",
> - np, ret, ddw_avail[2], liobn);
> + np, ret, ddw_avail[DDW_REMOVE_PE_DMA_WIN],
> liobn);
> else
> pr_debug("%pOF: successfully removed direct window:
> rtas returned "
> "%d to ibm,remove-pe-dma-window(%x) %llx\n",
> - np, ret, ddw_avail[2], liobn);
> + np, ret, ddw_avail[DDW_REMOVE_PE_DMA_WIN],
> liobn);
>
> delprop:
> if (remove_prop)
> @@ -889,11 +897,11 @@ static int query_ddw(struct pci_dev *dev, const
> u32 *ddw_avail,
> buid = pdn->phb->buid;
> cfg_addr = ((pdn->busno << 16) | (pdn->devfn << 8));
>
> - ret = rtas_call(ddw_avail[0], 3, 5, (u32 *)query,
> - cfg_addr, BUID_HI(buid), BUID_LO(buid));
> + ret = rtas_call(ddw_avail[DDW_QUERY_PE_DMA_WIN], 3, 5, (u32
> *)query,
> + cfg_addr, BUID_HI(buid), BUID_LO(buid));
> dev_info(&dev->dev, "ibm,query-pe-dma-windows(%x) %x %x %x"
> - " returned %d\n", ddw_avail[0], cfg_addr,
> BUID_HI(buid),
> - BUID_LO(buid), ret);
> + " returned %d\n", ddw_avail[DDW_QUERY_PE_DMA_WIN],
> cfg_addr,
> + BUID_HI(buid), BUID_LO(buid), ret);
> return ret;
> }
>
> @@ -920,15 +928,16 @@ static int create_ddw(struct pci_dev *dev,
> const u32 *ddw_avail,
>
> do {
> /* extra outputs are LIOBN and dma-addr (hi, lo) */
> - ret = rtas_call(ddw_avail[1], 5, 4, (u32 *)create,
> - cfg_addr, BUID_HI(buid), BUID_LO(buid),
> - page_shift, window_shift);
> + ret = rtas_call(ddw_avail[DDW_CREATE_PE_DMA_WIN], 5, 4,
> + (u32 *)create, cfg_addr, BUID_HI(buid),
> + BUID_LO(buid), page_shift,
> window_shift);
> } while (rtas_busy_delay(ret));
> dev_info(&dev->dev,
> "ibm,create-pe-dma-window(%x) %x %x %x %x %x returned
> %d "
> - "(liobn = 0x%x starting addr = %x %x)\n", ddw_avail[1],
> - cfg_addr, BUID_HI(buid), BUID_LO(buid), page_shift,
> - window_shift, ret, create->liobn, create->addr_hi,
> create->addr_lo);
> + "(liobn = 0x%x starting addr = %x %x)\n",
> + ddw_avail[DDW_CREATE_PE_DMA_WIN], cfg_addr,
> BUID_HI(buid),
> + BUID_LO(buid), page_shift, window_shift, ret, create-
> >liobn,
> + create->addr_hi, create->addr_lo);
>
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -996,7 +1005,7 @@ static u64 enable_ddw(struct pci_dev *dev,
> struct device_node *pdn)
> int page_shift;
> u64 dma_addr, max_addr;
> struct device_node *dn;
> - u32 ddw_avail[3];
> + u32 ddw_avail[DDW_APPLICABLE_SIZE];
> struct direct_window *window;
> struct property *win64;
> struct dynamic_dma_window_prop *ddwprop;
> @@ -1029,7 +1038,7 @@ static u64 enable_ddw(struct pci_dev *dev,
> struct device_node *pdn)
> * the property is actually in the parent, not the PE
> */
> ret = of_property_read_u32_array(pdn, "ibm,ddw-applicable",
> - &ddw_avail[0], 3);
> + &ddw_avail[0],
> DDW_APPLICABLE_SIZE);
> if (ret)
> goto out_failed;
>
Tested-by: David Dai <zdai@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists