[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMo8BfJBsU4xvUZe8HEJ=t8cYRh4RpQBqdustYRovjk4FUYsQg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2020 14:31:39 -0700
From: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@...il.com>
To: Jin Yao <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
jolsa@...nel.org, LKML <Linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, kan.liang@...el.com,
yao.jin@...el.com, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] Missing instruction_pointer_set() instances
On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 7:59 PM Jin Yao <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> There is a potential security issue that perf kernel samples
> may be leaked even though kernel sampling is disabled. For fixing
> the potential leakage, the idea is to use instruction_pointer_set
> to set invalid ip address in leaked perf samples in some cases.
>
> But instruction_pointer_set is missing on some architectures.
> Define instruction_pointer_set for these architectures.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jin Yao <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> arch/alpha/include/asm/ptrace.h | 6 ++++++
> arch/arc/include/asm/ptrace.h | 6 ++++++
> arch/nds32/include/asm/ptrace.h | 7 +++++++
> arch/xtensa/include/asm/ptrace.h | 6 ++++++
> 4 files changed, 25 insertions(+)
For xtensa:
Acked-by: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@...il.com>
--
Thanks.
-- Max
Powered by blists - more mailing lists