linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.7 000/120] 5.7.13-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200804030902.GB16602@1wt.eu>
Date:   Tue, 4 Aug 2020 05:09:02 +0200
From:   Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "torvalds@...ux-foundation.org" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, patches@...nelci.org,
        Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.7 000/120] 5.7.13-rc1 review

Hi Guenter,

On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 08:01:07PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> I should have guessed. Bisect points to the random changes. Those are
> really causing an endless amount of trouble. I hope the problem they
> are solving is worth all that trouble.

I was exactly suggesting that we postpone them. I don't think the
problem is worth the trouble, and fixes are currently being proposed
so it might just be a matter of days.

Regards,
Willy