linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL 3/5] ARM: SoC changes for v5.9

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHp75VcadLh+hM244agKKif_QeSj1osHMzuC8wv9UVFo7diX5w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 4 Aug 2020 10:39:34 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        SoC Team <soc@...nel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL 3/5] ARM: SoC changes for v5.9

On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 10:33 AM Andy Shevchenko
<andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 10:02 AM Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 3 Aug 2020 at 21:49, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> > > ARM: SoC changes for v5.9
> >
> > > Andy Shevchenko (1):
> > >       ARM: orion/gpio: Make use of for_each_requested_gpio()
> >
> > This change broke the arm build (I noticed it when building multi_v5_defconfig):
> >
> > ../arch/arm/plat-orion/gpio.c:457:2: error: implicit declaration of
> > function ‘for_each_requested_gpio’
> > [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> >   457 |  for_each_requested_gpio(chip, i, label) {
> >       |  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >
> > for_each_requested_gpio isn't in Linus (Torvalds) tree yet. It will be
> > fixed when he pulls Linus Walleij's GPIO tree which has the commit:
> >
> >  b3337eb24831 gpiolib: Introduce for_each_requested_gpio_in_range() macro
>
> Linus W. specifically created an immutable branch [1] for this.
> And I think I commented somewhere that entire branch should be pulled.

https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-gpio/msg51186.html

Sorry if that message wasn't clear.

> [1]: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-gpio.git/log/?h=ib-for-each-requested

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko