lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdY+qb-d31cZjWtscSOMLxdvyaHc5xFbTd-k8AA0_fTXUg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 4 Aug 2020 09:55:40 +0200
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc:     Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        SoC Team <soc@...nel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL 3/5] ARM: SoC changes for v5.9

On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 9:34 AM Andy Shevchenko
<andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 10:02 AM Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 3 Aug 2020 at 21:49, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> > > ARM: SoC changes for v5.9
> >
> > > Andy Shevchenko (1):
> > >       ARM: orion/gpio: Make use of for_each_requested_gpio()
> >
> > This change broke the arm build (I noticed it when building multi_v5_defconfig):
> >
> > ../arch/arm/plat-orion/gpio.c:457:2: error: implicit declaration of
> > function ‘for_each_requested_gpio’
> > [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> >   457 |  for_each_requested_gpio(chip, i, label) {
> >       |  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >
> > for_each_requested_gpio isn't in Linus (Torvalds) tree yet. It will be
> > fixed when he pulls Linus Walleij's GPIO tree which has the commit:
> >
> >  b3337eb24831 gpiolib: Introduce for_each_requested_gpio_in_range() macro
>
> Linus W. specifically created an immutable branch [1] for this.
> And I think I commented somewhere that entire branch should be pulled.

OK let's fix it by firing off the GPIO pull request ASAP.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ