[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2008040949360.2575@hadrien>
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2020 09:49:52 +0200 (CEST)
From: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...ia.fr>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
cc: Denis Efremov <efremov@...ux.com>,
Coccinelle <cocci@...teme.lip6.fr>,
Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@...6.fr>,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...ia.fr>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@...g.fr>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] coccinelle: api: add kvmalloc script
On Tue, 4 Aug 2020, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > Changes in v3:
> > - kvfree rules added
>
> I find it interesting to you found such an addition needed for this SmPL script.
> I imagine that it can be helpful to support such a source code search by
> a separate script for the semantic patch language.
>
> I am curious if my patch review comments for the second version got also a bit
> of your software development attention.
>
> Another implementation detail is relevant for further clarification.
> The SmPL rules for patch generation differ in search functionality
> which is provided for other operation modes.
> Can these deviations influence the confidence level?
I see no useful information in this review, nor in the v2 review.
julia
Powered by blists - more mailing lists