linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH kernel] serial_core: Check for port state when tty is in error state

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aec59f64-7c84-d341-64ee-9e9f18161ac9@ozlabs.ru>
Date:   Tue, 4 Aug 2020 20:37:19 +1000
From:   Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@...abs.ru>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH kernel] serial_core: Check for port state when tty is
 in error state



On 04/08/2020 20:09, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 08:02:27PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>> Ping?
>>
>> ps. Greg, your name came up in "git format-patch -M --stdout -1 HEAD |
>> ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl --norolestats --l" ;)
> 
> It's in my queue to review, but can't do anything now that the merge
> window is open.

Ah ok. No hurry.

> Also, as it's an RFC, that means you don't think it should be merged, so
> perhaps do some work to verify that you think this is correct and resend
> it?

It is correct, I am just not too sure if I should add such checks
everywhere, that's all. Thanks,

> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 

-- 
Alexey