linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt: bindings: interrupt-controller: Add binding description for msc313-intc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAFr9PXn_RSwWoaWEmW5m1pBVgo5c41KfEy0db-cgt0+v_sv5Ww@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 6 Aug 2020 23:46:16 +0900
From:   Daniel Palmer <daniel@...f.com>
To:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Cc:     "moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt: bindings: interrupt-controller: Add binding
 description for msc313-intc

Hi Rob,

On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 at 23:15, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org> wrote:

> Why are you sending another version? You ignored the errors and my
> questions on the RFC.

Sorry I didn't think I got any responses RFC but after searching it looks
like the email from your bot and your question about the two custom
properties went into a folder I wasn't looking at.

Based on Marc's feedback (that there should be an static irqchip
struct for each variation)
I'm going to drop the custom properties and make the metadata they had
part of the driver. They were basically there to try to make the
driver universal.

Again sorry for my mishap.

Daniel