[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200807131208.GT14854@MiWiFi-R3L-srv>
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2020 21:12:08 +0800
From: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
To: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: mike.kravetz@...cle.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10] mm/hugetlb: narrow the hugetlb_lock protection
area during preparing huge page
On 08/07/20 at 05:12pm, Wei Yang wrote:
> set_hugetlb_cgroup_[rsvd] just manipulate page local data, which is not
> necessary to be protected by hugetlb_lock.
>
> Let's take this out.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...ux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> mm/hugetlb.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> index 9473eb6800e9..1f2010c9dd8d 100644
> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> @@ -1494,9 +1494,9 @@ static void prep_new_huge_page(struct hstate *h, struct page *page, int nid)
> {
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&page->lru);
> set_compound_page_dtor(page, HUGETLB_PAGE_DTOR);
> - spin_lock(&hugetlb_lock);
> set_hugetlb_cgroup(page, NULL);
> set_hugetlb_cgroup_rsvd(page, NULL);
> + spin_lock(&hugetlb_lock);
Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
> h->nr_huge_pages++;
> h->nr_huge_pages_node[nid]++;
> spin_unlock(&hugetlb_lock);
> --
> 2.20.1 (Apple Git-117)
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists