[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200807142800.GA14692@L-31X9LVDL-1304.local>
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2020 22:28:00 +0800
From: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
mike.kravetz@...cle.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] mm/hugetlb: make sure to get NULL when list is
empty
On Fri, Aug 07, 2020 at 08:49:51PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
>On 08/07/20 at 05:12pm, Wei Yang wrote:
>> list_first_entry() may not return NULL even when the list is empty.
>>
>> Let's make sure the behavior by using list_first_entry_or_null(),
>> otherwise it would corrupt the list.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...ux.alibaba.com>
>> ---
>> mm/hugetlb.c | 3 ++-
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
>> index 62ec74f6d03f..0a2f3851b828 100644
>> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
>> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
>> @@ -237,7 +237,8 @@ get_file_region_entry_from_cache(struct resv_map *resv, long from, long to)
>> VM_BUG_ON(resv->region_cache_count <= 0);
>
>
>We have had above line, is it possible to be NULL from list_first_entry?
>
>>
>> resv->region_cache_count--;
>> - nrg = list_first_entry(&resv->region_cache, struct file_region, link);
>> + nrg = list_first_entry_or_null(&resv->region_cache,
>> + struct file_region, link);
>> VM_BUG_ON(!nrg);
Or we can remove this VM_BUG_ON()?
>> list_del(&nrg->link);
>>
>> --
>> 2.20.1 (Apple Git-117)
>>
>>
--
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me
Powered by blists - more mailing lists