lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAF6AEGv5Yf1x7aCEauP7XtzTjpUCxJt6_GzxFhFXyf_DX_Gi+g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 7 Aug 2020 08:51:48 -0700
From:   Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>
To:     Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc:     Tanmay Shah <tanmay@...eaurora.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        freedreno <freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Sean Paul <seanpaul@...omium.org>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>, aravindh@...eaurora.org,
        Abhinav Kumar <abhinavk@...eaurora.org>, khsieh@...eaurora.org,
        Chandan Uddaraju <chandanu@...eaurora.org>,
        Vara Reddy <varar@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 3/5] drm/msm/dp: add support for DP PLL driver

On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 8:27 AM Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> On 8/7/20 12:17 AM, Tanmay Shah wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/Kconfig b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/Kconfig
> > index ea3c4d094d09..cc1392b29022 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/Kconfig
> > @@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ config DRM_MSM_HDMI_HDCP
> >  config DRM_MSM_DP
> >       bool "Enable DP support in MSM DRM driver"
> >       depends on DRM_MSM
> > +     default y
> >       help
> >         Compile in support for DP driver in msm drm driver. DP external
> >         display support is enabled through this config option. It can
>
> Hi,
>
> You need a very strong justification to make an optional part of a driver
> to be "default y".

My opinion is that if the driver is built, everything should be built.
This is what makes sense for distro's.  It is only the embedded case
where you want to trim down unneeded features where you might want to
disable some parts.  So 'default y' makes sense to me.

BR,
-R

> so why?
>
> thanks.
> --
> ~Randy
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ