[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5788fcd4bc9d055fa40302ecb6728265c7618772.camel@perches.com>
Date: Sun, 09 Aug 2020 10:07:07 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Steve French <smfrench@...il.com>, linmiaohe <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
Cc: Steve French <sfrench@...ba.org>,
CIFS <linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org>,
samba-technical <samba-technical@...ts.samba.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cifs: Convert to use the fallthrough macro
On Sun, 2020-08-09 at 11:46 -0500, Steve French wrote:
> Is this conversion from "/* Fallthrough */" to the preferred (?)
> "fallthrough;" documented anywhere?
Documentation/process/deprecated.rst
As there have been a long list of flaws `due to missing "break" statements
<https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/484.html>`_, we no longer allow
implicit fall-through. In order to identify intentional fall-through
cases, we have adopted a pseudo-keyword macro "fallthrough" which
expands to gcc's extension `__attribute__((__fallthrough__))
<https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Statement-Attributes.html>`_.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists