[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200809083858.GA7517@kozik-lap>
Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2020 10:38:58 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Stephen Kitt <steve@....org>
Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch/arm: use simple i2c probe function
On Fri, Aug 07, 2020 at 05:31:00PM +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> The i2c probe functions here don't use the id information provided in
> their second argument, so the single-parameter i2c probe function
> ("probe_new") can be used instead.
>
> This avoids scanning the identifier tables during probes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Kitt <steve@....org>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-dm644x-evm.c | 5 ++---
> arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-dm646x-evm.c | 10 ++++------
> arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-crag6410-module.c | 5 ++---
> 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
Hi,
You need to split it per sub architecture maintainers. The subject
prefix is then for example: "ARM: s3c64xx: ".
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists