[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200809191819.3eb1a26e@heffalump.sk2.org>
Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2020 19:18:27 +0200
From: Stephen Kitt <steve@....org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch/arm: use simple i2c probe function
Hi,
On Sun, 9 Aug 2020 10:38:58 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 07, 2020 at 05:31:00PM +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> > The i2c probe functions here don't use the id information provided in
> > their second argument, so the single-parameter i2c probe function
> > ("probe_new") can be used instead.
> >
> > This avoids scanning the identifier tables during probes.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Kitt <steve@....org>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-dm644x-evm.c | 5 ++---
> > arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-dm646x-evm.c | 10 ++++------
> > arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-crag6410-module.c | 5 ++---
> > 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> You need to split it per sub architecture maintainers. The subject
> prefix is then for example: "ARM: s3c64xx: ".
Thanks, will do!
Regards,
Stephen
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists