linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 08/24] seqlock: lockdep assert non-preemptibility on seqcount

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 10 Aug 2020 21:55:20 +0200
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "Ahmed S. Darwish" <a.darwish@...utronix.de>
Cc:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        "Sebastian A. Siewior" <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 08/24] seqlock: lockdep assert non-preemptibility on seqcount_t write

Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> writes:
> On Sun, Aug 09, 2020 at 08:42:51PM +0200, Ahmed S. Darwish wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 08, 2020 at 04:21:22PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> > Reverting it fixes the problem. Is this being addressed ?
>> >
>> 
>> @Peter, I think let's revert this one for now?
>
> Please do, it's blowing up my local builds as well :(

Peter and Ingo sorted the header mess last week and I just sent a pull
request to Linus.

Thanks,

        tglx