[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200811100613.GA148069@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 12:06:13 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: "Ahmed S. Darwish" <a.darwish@...utronix.de>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
"Sebastian A. Siewior" <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 08/24] seqlock: lockdep assert non-preemptibility on
seqcount_t write
On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 09:55:20PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> writes:
> > On Sun, Aug 09, 2020 at 08:42:51PM +0200, Ahmed S. Darwish wrote:
> >> On Sat, Aug 08, 2020 at 04:21:22PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >> > Reverting it fixes the problem. Is this being addressed ?
> >> >
> >>
> >> @Peter, I think let's revert this one for now?
> >
> > Please do, it's blowing up my local builds as well :(
>
> Peter and Ingo sorted the header mess last week and I just sent a pull
> request to Linus.
Thanks, that looks good and works for my build tests!
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists