linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 08/24] seqlock: lockdep assert non-preemptibility on seqcount

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 11 Aug 2020 12:06:13 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:     "Ahmed S. Darwish" <a.darwish@...utronix.de>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        "Sebastian A. Siewior" <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 08/24] seqlock: lockdep assert non-preemptibility on
 seqcount_t write

On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 09:55:20PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> writes:
> > On Sun, Aug 09, 2020 at 08:42:51PM +0200, Ahmed S. Darwish wrote:
> >> On Sat, Aug 08, 2020 at 04:21:22PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >> > Reverting it fixes the problem. Is this being addressed ?
> >> >
> >> 
> >> @Peter, I think let's revert this one for now?
> >
> > Please do, it's blowing up my local builds as well :(
> 
> Peter and Ingo sorted the header mess last week and I just sent a pull
> request to Linus.

Thanks, that looks good and works for my build tests!

greg k-h