[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2008101624380.2466@hadrien>
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 16:24:54 +0200 (CEST)
From: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...ia.fr>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
cc: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>,
Sumera Priyadarsini <sylphrenadin@...il.com>,
Coccinelle <cocci@...teme.lip6.fr>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@...6.fr>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@...g.fr>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] documentation: coccinelle: Improve command example
for make C={1, 2}
On Mon, 10 Aug 2020, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Aug 2020 09:30:18 +0200
> Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de> wrote:
>
> > > Modify coccinelle documentation to further clarify
> > > the usage of the makefile C variable flag by coccicheck.
> >
> > How do you think about a wording variant like the following
> > for the change description?
> >
> > Clarify the usage of the make variable āCā for coccicheck.
> >
> >
> > > +C flag is used. The C flag is a variable used by the makefile
> >
> > Can such a wording approach trigger understanding difficulties?
> > [...]
>
> Markus, please don't harass our contributors. This patch is an
> improvement and, unless Julia disagrees, I am happy to apply it.
There will be a V3. Thanks.
julia
Powered by blists - more mailing lists