[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200810081914.37224551@lwn.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 08:19:14 -0600
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
Cc: Sumera Priyadarsini <sylphrenadin@...il.com>,
Coccinelle <cocci@...teme.lip6.fr>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@...6.fr>,
Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@...g.fr>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] documentation: coccinelle: Improve command example
for make C={1, 2}
On Mon, 10 Aug 2020 09:30:18 +0200
Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de> wrote:
> > Modify coccinelle documentation to further clarify
> > the usage of the makefile C variable flag by coccicheck.
>
> How do you think about a wording variant like the following
> for the change description?
>
> Clarify the usage of the make variable āCā for coccicheck.
>
>
> > +C flag is used. The C flag is a variable used by the makefile
>
> Can such a wording approach trigger understanding difficulties?
> [...]
Markus, please don't harass our contributors. This patch is an
improvement and, unless Julia disagrees, I am happy to apply it.
jon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists