linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V5 0/3] Intel Platform Monitoring Technology

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200811080433.GI4411@dell>
Date:   Tue, 11 Aug 2020 09:04:33 +0100
From:   Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:     "David E. Box" <david.e.box@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     dvhart@...radead.org, andy@...radead.org, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
        alexander.h.duyck@...ux.intel.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 0/3] Intel Platform Monitoring Technology

On Mon, 10 Aug 2020, David E. Box wrote:

> Friendly ping.

Don't do that.  Sending contentless pings is seldom helpful.

If you think your set has been dropped please just send a [RESEND].

This is probably worth doing anyway, since you've sent v2, v3, v4 and
now v5 has reply-tos of one another.  The thread has become quite
messy as a result.

Also please take the time to identify where we are with respect to the
current release cycle.  The merge-window is open presently.  Meaning
that most maintainers are busy, either sending out pull-requests or
ramping up for the next cycle (or just taking a quick breather).

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog