linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V5 0/3] Intel Platform Monitoring Technology

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4989e6bdfcd787e01c8459f4b5b9517a2ae73b24.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 11 Aug 2020 07:50:15 -0700
From:   "David E. Box" <david.e.box@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:     dvhart@...radead.org, andy@...radead.org, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
        alexander.h.duyck@...ux.intel.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 0/3] Intel Platform Monitoring Technology

On Tue, 2020-08-11 at 09:04 +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Aug 2020, David E. Box wrote:
> 
> > Friendly ping.
> 
> Don't do that.  Sending contentless pings is seldom helpful.
> 
> If you think your set has been dropped please just send a [RESEND].
> 
> This is probably worth doing anyway, since you've sent v2, v3, v4 and
> now v5 has reply-tos of one another.  The thread has become quite
> messy as a result.
> 
> Also please take the time to identify where we are with respect to
> the
> current release cycle.  The merge-window is open presently.  Meaning
> that most maintainers are busy, either sending out pull-requests or
> ramping up for the next cycle (or just taking a quick breather).
> 

No problem. I'll resend v5 in a new thread when rc1 is tagged. Thanks.