[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f29c7d35-72a9-b8d1-98dc-427c6fa3cc31@nvidia.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 09:18:35 +0800
From: JC Kuo <jckuo@...dia.com>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
Nagarjuna Kristam <nkristam@...dia.com>
CC: <balbi@...nel.org>, <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
<jonathanh@...dia.com>, <yuehaibing@...wei.com>,
<heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>, <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: gadget: tegra-xudc: Avoid GFP_ATOMIC where it is not
needed
Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: JC Kuo <jckuo@...dia.com>
On 8/10/20 10:00 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 09, 2020 at 09:29:48AM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
>> There is no need to use GFP_ATOMIC here. It is a probe function, no
>> spinlock is taken.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
>> ---
>> drivers/usb/gadget/udc/tegra-xudc.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> Looks good to me. I can't think of any reason why this would have to be
> an atomic allocation. Nagarjuna, please shout if this is really needed,
> otherwise:
>
> Acked-by: Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists