linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] usb: gadget: tegra-xudc: Avoid GFP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 10 Aug 2020 16:00:35 +0200
From:   Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
To:     Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
        Nagarjuna Kristam <nkristam@...dia.com>
Cc:     balbi@...nel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        yuehaibing@...wei.com, heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com,
        linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: gadget: tegra-xudc: Avoid GFP_ATOMIC where it is
 not needed

On Sun, Aug 09, 2020 at 09:29:48AM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> There is no need to use GFP_ATOMIC here. It is a probe function, no
> spinlock is taken.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
> ---
>  drivers/usb/gadget/udc/tegra-xudc.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Looks good to me. I can't think of any reason why this would have to be
an atomic allocation. Nagarjuna, please shout if this is really needed,
otherwise:

Acked-by: Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)