[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=VtPX19o-tdyPBT=07AgbT7kWKhjpuU4d22SQ5D0r=jog@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 14:17:11 -0700
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: Sibi Sankar <sibis@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
"Brown, Len" <len.brown@...el.com>,
Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] PM / Domains: Add GENPD_FLAG_SUSPEND_ON flag
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 12:03 PM Sibi Sankar <sibis@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>
> This is for power domains which needs to stay powered on for suspend
> but can be powered on/off as part of runtime PM. This flag is aimed at
> power domains coupled to remote processors which enter suspend states
> independent to that of the application processor. Such power domains
> are turned off only on remote processor crash/shutdown.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <sibis@...eaurora.org>
> ---
> drivers/base/power/domain.c | 3 ++-
> include/linux/pm_domain.h | 5 +++++
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Seems sane to me.
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Tested-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists